How good does a good deed have to be before it's considered…well, “good?” Earlier this week I was driving home from work, and I heard a commercial on the radio along these lines:
“Come join the lovely ladies of [some strip club] and help out Haiti. That’s right; for the next two weeks, you can get your altruism on in the most beautiful setting imaginable; We’re donating all cover charges to Haitian relief…”
Admittedly, I was not listening to radio marketed as “safe for the whole family" at the time, but I still did not see that coming. And I don’t begrudge the strippers or managers for wanting to help their neighbors in need; it just seems like an odd fund-raising technique. To be fair, strippers and their “regulars” may be very involved in any number of local charities, but I can’t imagine that men are drawn to strip clubs for the humanitarian relief.
Lap Dances for Haiti is an obvious and laughable target (and yes, that phrase was used to promote the campaign), but it did get me thinking about motives. As people constantly mixed in our motives, I wondered if there was any substantial difference between this marketing ploy and any other business promotions that trade on relief.
So what do you think; is it a difference of kind or degree? What separates the club that sells sex for charity and the donations of a boxing promoter who trades in violence or even the high end retailer that donates a portion of the proceeds from my over-priced designer wallet?
*If this post disappointed you, does it help or hurt to know that I refrained from using the original title, Debbie Does Charity Work?